I'm not sure you can trust any of the modern US media.
On one side the media report early voting has the Democrats leading, on the other side it is the GOP leading. States the media had previously declared as Red or Blue are now Swing States, and the direction of the swing depends on the politics of those reporting.
Tactically, politically, both sides of the media are betting on the human desire to back and be associated with a winner, they hope the undecided treat voting like buying a lottery ticket.
It is impossible for both sides to be correct, and to me it only highlights that the modern media can no longer be trusted to report facts without bias.
Even so, I was shocked by some News Ltd headlines stating "He's losing it for us!", it looks like they are hedging bets, they want to be seen to back a winner too. If he doesn't win they'll come out and claim "We told you so!", while stoking the fires of rebellion!
On one side the media report early voting has the Democrats leading, on the other side it is the GOP leading. States the media had previously declared as Red or Blue are now Swing States, and the direction of the swing depends on the politics of those reporting.
Tactically, politically, both sides of the media are betting on the human desire to back and be associated with a winner, they hope the undecided treat voting like buying a lottery ticket.
It is impossible for both sides to be correct, and to me it only highlights that the modern media can no longer be trusted to report facts without bias.
Even so, I was shocked by some News Ltd headlines stating "He's losing it for us!", it looks like they are hedging bets, they want to be seen to back a winner too. If he doesn't win they'll come out and claim "We told you so!", while stoking the fires of rebellion!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"