(08-04-2024, 08:34 AM)kruddler link Wrote:....and opinions are not wrong?No this is a classic case of using stats to show efficiency from inside 50 entries. That is conversion to scoring correct?
Some peoples opinions have changed from last night on a rewatch of the game. I suggest you do the same.
I already said that we were inaccurate in front of goal.
There is a difference between being accurate and being efficient.
Last quarter we were accurate.
1st quarter we were not.
Last quarter we were not efficient.
1st quarter we were.
Yet, I'm talking about something different (but more important). Taking your actual chances when you create them and get a mark in front or even on a slight angle, and im not talking about stuff like cripps 55 metre effort from the boundary, or Charlie trying to kick it from 60 at the mcc members stand. I'm talking about Jessie 30 out directly in front. Harry on a slight angle 45 metres out, hollands, 40 metres out, owies not making the distance from 45 directly in front.
We needed the repeat entries to create the scoring opportunities and were forcing it in to keep it in and score.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson