07-25-2024, 03:47 AM
(07-25-2024, 03:24 AM)LP link Wrote:That's just a further demonstration you might not fully understand the meaning of the numbers you present, you don't have to express your claims in words to convey meaning, they are an inherent property of the figures presented. Math is a language, and the numbers hold and describe relationships, which can also be described in written word.
You have become so heavily invested in this solo ruck debate it is clouding your judgement, to the point you can't see that you are contradicting yourself.
Despite many of us posting that it remains an MC decision on a week by week tactical basis, including my earlier #48 Reply in this very thread which stated "this week might have been...." , you continue the barrage.
Only fools talk definitive.
Mate, lay off the crack pipe would ya.
You wrote this...
Quote:In the past you have constantly argued you don't want TDK at a reduced number of ruck contests that is caused by playing two rucks, and that the number of ruck contests he gets to directly reflects in his good stoppage figures.If that is something that i have constantly argued (which is 100% false) then provide proof of it, or shut the hell up.
You make stuff up, i call you on it, you do your best Warney interpretation and drift into a completely different topic in an attempt to distance yourself from the BS you made up and got called on.
Give it a rest.