General Discussions

[PaulP]

You object to what you perceive is a loophole in the definition, assume a phalanx of unworthy candidates are going to sign on as a result of this "loophole", make no attempt to confirm whether there are any checks and balances in place to reduce the incidence of such applications, and wildly assert that all these hard earned research dollars are being flushed down the toilet, all without the slightest bit of evidence.