General Discussions

[LP]

Still waiting for all that evidence you have piled up, of men dressed as women, faux vaginas and all the rest, with their snouts in the trough, diverting funds from the “worthy” candidates.

Aren't I supposed to be the one being alarmist and extreme?

Conflating rorts with waste was the accusation you have made, but it's based on a fallacy, so obviously I can't provide evidence of a fallacy because it's a fallacy, not part of the debate. Waste is not always rort, never was never will be, rorts can be waste.

There are no declarative statements about the worth of individuals or groups, the accusation is emotive, are you posting that deliberately or just become confused, the assertion is not based in fact?

Just as it's invalid to include all people who "identity as female" in prostate studies, it's completely invalid to include all people who "identify as male" in studies of endometriosis or menopause. Nothing you can write or speak will change that fact, and as you mention repeatedly they will are not part of the baseline because they are minority.

We vote, we spend, we create, we matter, disregard us at your peril and it will come at a huge cost. But there aren't many of us, the little we get you can ignore, it's a drop in the ocean, you won't even notice.