The Great Ruck Debate.

[kruddler]

The problem is that it doesn't seem like a debate.
It seems like a lecture.

...

What do you actually want people to say?
Most folk here acknowledge that there are times when we are better off going with one ruck...they agree with you.
You won't acknowledge that there are opposition that we may be better off engaging two rucks.
That's fair enough.
That's your opinion.
It doesn't make it right or wrong.

I don't want people to say anything other than give examples to back up their opinions.

As an example of how this 'debate' goes, lets try this hypothetical scenario.....
I can say "TDK is the best ruck in the game" and give reasons why, provide some stats. Use some footage for comparison.
Others can say. "No he's not."
.....which is fine.....but maybe give an example of why he is not. Maybe give an example of who might be.
People are being contrarian, without offering any substance.
Thats why its a 'lecture' because there are no actual points to debate coming from the opposition.