07-21-2024, 02:35 AM
Despite what some people like to make out, nobody is suggesting that the current side has 1 problem to solve and 1 problem only (1 ruck vs 2 rucks).
When doing analysis, simplistic at that, of wins vs losses, its easy to jump to conclusions.
Even when those kind of statistics have backed up my claims, i've still cautioned the use of them for that regard.
That being said.
There is more and more statistics, visual queues, win/loss records, expert analysis and even MC choices that are all tending the same way in regards to this debate. I've done more than enough analysis over the years in regards to the pros and cons of this to know that each individual article for or against is setlling the whole debate very short as its always oversimplified in a short form article. But the amount of evidence that is trending that way, is starting to make believers of those who were originally skeptics.
Instead of people worrying about WHO is saying it. Look at what is actually being said. It may even make sense.
When doing analysis, simplistic at that, of wins vs losses, its easy to jump to conclusions.
Even when those kind of statistics have backed up my claims, i've still cautioned the use of them for that regard.
That being said.
There is more and more statistics, visual queues, win/loss records, expert analysis and even MC choices that are all tending the same way in regards to this debate. I've done more than enough analysis over the years in regards to the pros and cons of this to know that each individual article for or against is setlling the whole debate very short as its always oversimplified in a short form article. But the amount of evidence that is trending that way, is starting to make believers of those who were originally skeptics.
Instead of people worrying about WHO is saying it. Look at what is actually being said. It may even make sense.