I have to wonder in all this debate, there are some also bemoaning the failure to throw Charlie into D50, is that because we had no cover for him in F50 given we had to use BigH in the ruck at times?
We had options a plenty for the midfield but didn't use them, and it seems we were stuck with a KPP configuration that forced us to persist with injured players.
The decisions aren't without consequence, the MC needs to weigh up the risks of being all in with one or the other. I think we all agree the weekend was a fail, thankfully we didn't learn this lesson in a final!
We had options a plenty for the midfield but didn't use them, and it seems we were stuck with a KPP configuration that forced us to persist with injured players.
The decisions aren't without consequence, the MC needs to weigh up the risks of being all in with one or the other. I think we all agree the weekend was a fail, thankfully we didn't learn this lesson in a final!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"