06-30-2024, 11:57 PM
(06-30-2024, 11:52 PM)Lods link Wrote:It's the diversity of the opinion I'm looking for without going to deep in the list....
You won't see a lot of difference with the top 2 or 3, but around 4 and 5 you may get some different names.
My top 2 in order were easy...
It's
1) Weitering
2) Cripps.
(remembering it's not the best, but most valuable)
After that I struggle a bit
I'd probably have one of the key forwards...and I'd probably go for McKay over Curnow at this stage.
Where to next I'm not sure.
Walsh, Curnow, DeKoning (we've won well without them, or without them having a lot of influence) or one of the role players that provide us with a much needed aspect we get from no other player.
No doubt. The principle is much the same as team selection for match day. The first 10/12 basically pick themselves. Nobody is seriously thinking that Cripps, Weitering, Walsh, Curnow, McKay, Acres etc. are actually competing for spots. It's really the "bottom" (I use that word without intending anything negative) half/third of the team where the MC would have some decision to make IMO.