The Great Ruck Debate.

[kruddler]

Personally, I think the debate is dead already, has been for most of this season.

Pretty much everything Voss has done this season is working perfectly. When we needed two rucks he picked two and we dominated the stoppages and midfield, when we could go with one he went with one and it's worked equally as well.

Except when we picked 2 we lost more often.

The irrelevance of the tap and the HtA, and the importance of Ruck 2nd efforts has never been clearer, again obvious. Not weird statistical correlations or complicated assertions of causality needed. Just the basics, see ball get ball, don't stand and watch. We don't need to blame a depleted backline or misfiring forwards on the Ruck setup, all have their own responsibilities.

So obvious you didn't understand where the stats for RC-HTA% came from or what it means. For a scientific mind, that is very poor form from you.

You've been caught out in the debate several times from skimming and/or not comprehending posts.
You also choose to completely fail to reply when proven wrong - 'i didn't see it' -
Most recently with injuries from ruck contests.
Or when we've played no rucks at all, yet dominated and won the game.

Everything is 'obvious' until its pointed out that you are wrong, and then you go MIA.

You start the fight and then run away.  :