I suspect when we did this last year folks voted in two different ways.
Some picked players they considered the best 22 on the list.
Others picked a balanced side that would take the field.
So if you have an excess of talent or a type of player in one part of the field how do we want to play this exercise.
It's a subtle difference and would mostly only apply to players on the fringe.
So can we just clarify.
Best 22 or Best side?
Some picked players they considered the best 22 on the list.
Others picked a balanced side that would take the field.
So if you have an excess of talent or a type of player in one part of the field how do we want to play this exercise.
It's a subtle difference and would mostly only apply to players on the fringe.
So can we just clarify.
Best 22 or Best side?