10-18-2023, 02:12 AM
I feel so sad for Warner, ............................. not!
Whether the call was out or not should make no difference, the pill only has to flick the stumps and generally the bails will fall, as far as I can tell the way the current rule is written it is unbiased, sometimes it favours the bowler, sometimes it favours the batsmen!
Warner is trying to bully officials into the running with the Batsmen biased version. He wants to be careful because when he shoots off his mouth he might well bully the ruling body into a change, but they could easily opt for the bowler biased version of DRS and eliminate all those occasions when the batsmen benefitted from the umpire's call!
Whether the call was out or not should make no difference, the pill only has to flick the stumps and generally the bails will fall, as far as I can tell the way the current rule is written it is unbiased, sometimes it favours the bowler, sometimes it favours the batsmen!
Warner is trying to bully officials into the running with the Batsmen biased version. He wants to be careful because when he shoots off his mouth he might well bully the ruling body into a change, but they could easily opt for the bowler biased version of DRS and eliminate all those occasions when the batsmen benefitted from the umpire's call!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"