10-07-2023, 11:01 PM
(10-07-2023, 10:49 PM)kruddler link Wrote:In 1 post you go over the top talking about how the MC are a team of experts.
In the very next post you agree that they sometimes you find them completely bizarre. Given they are human and fallible,
Its clear that sometimes they get it wrong.
So apparently they only get it wrong when i don't disagree with them?
......and nowhere did i say we would win the prelim, or the GF. But there is a difference between fighting man to man and fighting one hand behind your back.
My assertion that I don't understand some MC choices is a failing on my part, not the MC's. By the very nature of the industry, we are locked out of the knowledge base and experience base required to understand the decisions made. My feelings about strange selections are a result of this, and not because I can pick when they've stuffed up or because I know things they don't.
I don’t accept your thesis that 2 rucks and 2kpf is unworkable for us. I don’t accept your thesis that you can pick a better team than the MC. I don’t accept your thesis that you can see things the MC cannot. My lack of acceptance of these has absolutely nothing to do with any stupidity, laziness, or confusion on my part. It has nothing to do with not reading your voluminous contributions. I simply don’t agree. Many on here don’t agree, our club doesn’t agree, significant sections of the AFL community don’t agree.
I completely accept that my position is based to a degree on an appeal to authority, and I acknowledge that in order for my position to be true, the process for selecting a team must be relatively free of both corruption and incompetence. And I’m perfectly happy with those limitations.