Sam Newman at it again!

[LP]

I would have legislated it through Parliament...tested how it works for a couple of years in that format, sorted out any problems and then done the Referendum to make the Constitutional changes if appropriate.

Can I ask [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member], what do you think "it" is?

Many are left wondering what "it" is, the pro-Voice is loud if not louder than the naysayers, that's almost come across as badgering the voters. It feels like an accusation, if you vote no you are racist.

But many still do not know what "it" looks like other than an idea, and that vagueness has played into the naysayers hands!

Maybe legislation is what Albanese wants, and that could explain why he has been so vague.