General Discussions

[Thryleon]

So are you asserting that somehow the saving$ justify the crime?

There are many legitimate ways QANTAS could have raised funds to survive COVID, helped by politicians if necessary, without stooping to theft!

PS; Have QANTAS just "survived" the pandemic, didn't it announce a huge profit recently off the back of slashing thousands of workers due to pandemic duress?

no, what Im asserting is that when there is a financial incentive to go soft, they will because ultimately, there is no gain in having to take money off Qantas, and by extension its shareholders.

When Qantas shares are propping up the super funds, that means better pension outcomes for people on managed super funds.  Make them pay back covid payments, means costing jobs, means potentially sinking the last "Australian" international airline, means those costs get pushed back onto future travellers, means sinking share prices, means sinking super funds, means more penisoners means less money in government coffers, and ultimately a poorer quality of life all around.

I live in reality.  If the cost of doing something outweighs the benefit in doing so, why do it?

Because morally or legally thats the right thing to do?


What Im saying is prepare for the wet lettuce leaf!