The rise.... and RISE of Marc Pittonet

[kruddler]

The numbers shown Here and Here are pretty much self explanatory, they don't need a commentary the figures are clear.

You do realise there are caps on rotations, 1 player on the bench only counts as 1 and 1 rotation only. The assertion you can't take that players allocation / accumulation and spread it across a group of others is a Furphy. Anyway, more often that not we finish games with rotations left regardless of who is in the ruck combination, we aren't even using the full allocation we've already have!

Which makes the bench time argument for one ruck a strawman, you are somehow trying to assert we run out of rotations when we do not even always use the rotations we are allocated.

I suppose Voss was getting it wrong when he subbed Jack Silvagni, I'll write Voss a letter and see if he'll invite you in to explain! ;D

If you were a star wars character, you'd be a storm trooper. Firing off left right and centre, but never actually hitting anything.

1. The numbers are data. You put data together and you can get information.
You provided the data, i turned that into information.....which is quite clear.....yet you ignore.....as usual.

2. Caps on rotations, allocations left....its got literally nothing to do with this debate. All you need to realise is that a player can stay on the bench for longer, and get more of a rest when there is an extra seat available. No extra rotations used, just utilising the ones we have better and giving players more of a rest. The concept of rotations is not amount increasing the number of times people come on or off, but the amount of time they are off and resting.

3. No, its got nothing to do with rotations.....again.

4. Tell me you have lost the debate without telling me you have lost the debate.

Its as clear as day to anyone who can read. 2 rucks = more time on the bench for those rucks = less time on the bench for everyone else.
and
2 rucks in the team = less other players in the team, ie smaller running types.
That is it. You can try and deflect as much as you want, but you cannot get away from that point.