(08-17-2023, 07:16 PM)kruddler date Wrote:So please explain why you have failed to identify which games we have 1 ruck, 2 rucks etc. Which games a player was subbed out.The numbers shown Here and Here are pretty much self explanatory, they don't need a commentary the figures are clear.
You do realise there are caps on rotations, 1 player on the bench only counts as 1 and 1 rotation only. The assertion you can't take that players allocation / accumulation and spread it across a group of others is a Furphy. Anyway, more often that not we finish games with rotations left regardless of who is in the ruck combination, we aren't even using the full allocation we've already have!
Which makes the bench time argument for one ruck a strawman, you are somehow trying to assert we run out of rotations when we do not even always use the rotations we are allocated.
I suppose Voss was getting it wrong when he subbed Jack Silvagni, I'll write Voss a letter and see if he'll invite you in to explain! ;D
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"