07-17-2023, 08:07 AM
I've seen the Boyd incident. Not sure it's a two motion tackle. Unlike some of the others his positioning is one where he cannot see that his opponent disposed of the footy and simply completes a tackle.
The one argument against him is the outcome. If there is concussion it shouldn't automatically mean suspension and the referral to the tribunal is a tell that the MRO don't really know what to do with tackles these days.
The one argument against him is the outcome. If there is concussion it shouldn't automatically mean suspension and the referral to the tribunal is a tell that the MRO don't really know what to do with tackles these days.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson