The rise.... and RISE of Marc Pittonet

[PaulP]

Big difference between Warnock/Pittonet is strength.
Warnock was about the weakest bloke to ever compete in a ruck contest. He got away with using his height, which was greater than all else. Pittonet is about average height for a ruck (202cm) so he has to rely on his body work and strength....as we know he isn't a great jumper either.

Both could do more around the ground....but that could be said about half of the rucks on an AFL list.

Yes no doubt Warnock was a beanpole. I thought he was treated a little harshly by Carlton fans. Constantly injured and found it hard to get any kind of consistency or momentum going.