05-15-2023, 01:48 AM
(05-15-2023, 01:34 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:[member=906]Lods[/member] the only negative to putting him in the VFL is the impact it may have to Charlie and him being worn like a glove. It might change the mindset of everyone though and allow others to start chipping in more in his absence, and will likely sort out his own form. I dont see the point putting him elsewhere on the park unrehearsed, its likely to cause more issues than it solves. The one thing that I can see, is that the yips seem to be spreading where everyone is kicking like Harry did, and maybe that will send him a message better than anything else can. Watching Motlop and Cripps do what he did might snap him out of it. Its a pity we have to throw important games away in the process.
For mine, we dont respect the VFL enough and thats another reason to send him there.
If we could be confident of other avenues to goal the concentration on Charlie mightn't be a bad thing.
But we can't and all options come with a fair amount of risk.
(05-15-2023, 01:38 AM)LP link Wrote:We had a discussion like this just a few weeks back and the next week Charlie kicks 9 goals.
That's the letting him work through it option...the question is will that do more harm than good?
And that's a chance they'll have to take.
Whatever option we take the goal is the same.
We need McKay contributing and playing with confidence.
I think we'd all like to see him back, kicking mutiple goals on a regular basis...but whichever path we take he's too good, and too big a player not to have some role that benefits the side.

