04-11-2023, 10:10 AM
(04-11-2023, 09:33 AM)Mav link Wrote:Yep, reducing the impact to low was the obvious result.'Obvious' and 'MRP decisions' do not go hand in hand.
Personally, i can't stand the outcome based 'logic' used in the decision making.
If he hit Justin Koschitske, he would've been given life without parole for the same action.
Its either allowed or its not.
If it came out now that Sheezel had some delayed concussion, or a small fracture in the jaw, do the AFL get to appeal the MRP decision based on the outcome being harsher than first thought?
From a pure action point of view, it was ugly and not something you want to be showing the kiddies out there.