04-05-2023, 04:18 AM
Interesting.
Is it simply a matter of the finer points of things?
In COGS case, it sounds innocent enough, but he asked specifically "how is that not a free kick?" which is nothing untoward, but asking that in open play might have been a bridge too far for the umpire.
Perhaps he got his answer, and Harry was deemed to have not had full possession of the footy?
Anyway, it might be time to split this topic into its own to discuss dissent.
Is it simply a matter of the finer points of things?
In COGS case, it sounds innocent enough, but he asked specifically "how is that not a free kick?" which is nothing untoward, but asking that in open play might have been a bridge too far for the umpire.
Perhaps he got his answer, and Harry was deemed to have not had full possession of the footy?
Anyway, it might be time to split this topic into its own to discuss dissent.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson