(04-01-2023, 10:19 PM)PaulP link Wrote:Ì wonder why the umpire didn't include that in his explanation to Whitfield ?
Seems the ump said all that he needed in explaining to Whitfield that the dissent was for what Coniglio said/did, not what he said/did. . On-air commentators also mentioned the expletives... perhaps they could hear the edits once it was replayed?
After game commentators also, equipped with the exact reason for the dissent, agreed with the umps call.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17