03-26-2023, 10:55 AM
AFL Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond
One that got away? Perhaps. We really should have won it, but at least we didn’t lose.
Trends:
[1] We managed 15 voters this round, which may not be huge, but it is a measure of how many people use this site these days. It was only one down from this game last year, which was a tremendous win. Hopefully we can keep this level up throughout the season.
[2] The rating was 8.22, which is close enough to a C+. There was a large range in ratings, far more so than for most matches: some voters were disappointed and let it show, while others were less pessimistic. Fair enough: every sees the game differently.
This time last the rating was 9.58, but that was for a win.
[3] 16 players managed to get at least 1 vote, which suggests that a lot of players made a contribution. When we had a big win, we often managed 19 last year. Not sure if that trend will continue.
[4] The average vote for this game was 27, which also shoes the level of satisfaction in voters. Scores of 31 are more common when we win, while 23 or 24 do happen when we lose.
[5] Last years Patrick Cripps had a huge number of votes (342) in an epic win. This time it was Lewis Young who stood out with 340 votes. George Hewett scored 230 to be 2nd.
[6] 4 players managed 100 votes or more, a measure that shows how dominant our players can be. This time last year our 4 main mids all got over 100 votes. This time only 2 mids managed it. The others were defenders.
[7] Three players, Young, Hewett and Docherty, managed votes from everyone. Weitering missed 2.
[8] We blooded 3 recruits for this game, of which one, Ollie Hollands, managed a vote. As a general rule, the better our debutants fare in this game, the better we perform.
[9] This one was a game for defenders. We were thrashed in the middle, as can be identified by the lack of votes from many of our best midfielders.
Votes:
Young, Lewis 340
Hewett, George 230
Docherty, Sam 197
Weitering, Jacob 143
McKay, Harrison 91
Curnow, Charles 52
Saad, Adam 49
Cripps, Patrick 44
McGovern, Mitchell 27
Cerra, Adam 19
de Koning, Tom 19
Kennedy, Matthew 11
Newman, Nicholas 11
Motlop, Jesse 11
Hollands, Oliver 5
Curnow, Edward 3
Progressive Voting:
340 - Young, Lewis (0)
231 - Hewett, George (0)
198 - Docherty, Sam (0)
143 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
72 - McKay, Harrison (0)
53 - Curnow, Charles (0)
50 - Saad, Adam (0)
44 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
28 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
20 - Cerra, Adam (0)
20 - de Koning, Tom (0)
11 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
11 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
11 - Motlop, Jesse (0)
6 - Hollands, Oliver (0)
3 - Curnow, Edward (0)
It is interesting to note the differences. This is due to how the program rounds the votes off. It does, however, make for some confusion.
One that got away? Perhaps. We really should have won it, but at least we didn’t lose.
Trends:
[1] We managed 15 voters this round, which may not be huge, but it is a measure of how many people use this site these days. It was only one down from this game last year, which was a tremendous win. Hopefully we can keep this level up throughout the season.
[2] The rating was 8.22, which is close enough to a C+. There was a large range in ratings, far more so than for most matches: some voters were disappointed and let it show, while others were less pessimistic. Fair enough: every sees the game differently.
This time last the rating was 9.58, but that was for a win.
[3] 16 players managed to get at least 1 vote, which suggests that a lot of players made a contribution. When we had a big win, we often managed 19 last year. Not sure if that trend will continue.
[4] The average vote for this game was 27, which also shoes the level of satisfaction in voters. Scores of 31 are more common when we win, while 23 or 24 do happen when we lose.
[5] Last years Patrick Cripps had a huge number of votes (342) in an epic win. This time it was Lewis Young who stood out with 340 votes. George Hewett scored 230 to be 2nd.
[6] 4 players managed 100 votes or more, a measure that shows how dominant our players can be. This time last year our 4 main mids all got over 100 votes. This time only 2 mids managed it. The others were defenders.
[7] Three players, Young, Hewett and Docherty, managed votes from everyone. Weitering missed 2.
[8] We blooded 3 recruits for this game, of which one, Ollie Hollands, managed a vote. As a general rule, the better our debutants fare in this game, the better we perform.
[9] This one was a game for defenders. We were thrashed in the middle, as can be identified by the lack of votes from many of our best midfielders.
Votes:
Young, Lewis 340
Hewett, George 230
Docherty, Sam 197
Weitering, Jacob 143
McKay, Harrison 91
Curnow, Charles 52
Saad, Adam 49
Cripps, Patrick 44
McGovern, Mitchell 27
Cerra, Adam 19
de Koning, Tom 19
Kennedy, Matthew 11
Newman, Nicholas 11
Motlop, Jesse 11
Hollands, Oliver 5
Curnow, Edward 3
Progressive Voting:
340 - Young, Lewis (0)
231 - Hewett, George (0)
198 - Docherty, Sam (0)
143 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
72 - McKay, Harrison (0)
53 - Curnow, Charles (0)
50 - Saad, Adam (0)
44 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
28 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
20 - Cerra, Adam (0)
20 - de Koning, Tom (0)
11 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
11 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
11 - Motlop, Jesse (0)
6 - Hollands, Oliver (0)
3 - Curnow, Edward (0)
It is interesting to note the differences. This is due to how the program rounds the votes off. It does, however, make for some confusion.
Live Long and Prosper!