The Wind industry will tell you SolarPV is a filthy industry that consumes perfectly good land which could can be used for agribusiness.
The SolarPV industry will claim Wind generates lots of unrecyclable waste, kills rare birds, is a hazard for shipping and causes infrasound harm to nearby residents.
Neither Wind nor SolarPV comment on the battery industry because they need batteries or they are literally dead and buried being unrecyclable.
The Hydrogen industry will tell you batteries are filthy, short lived and consume rare resources.
Battery manufacturers will tell you hydrogen is made from coal, is highly inefficient and will consume all our drinking water.
The fossil fuel industry presents a conglomeration of all these accusations.
They all sprout lies of sorts to line their own pockets, claiming one or the other has some sort of high ground is political not technical decision!
The truth is many of the accusations have some substance in a certain limited frame of reference, which is usually a privileged perspective that is chosen to make one technology look good and the other look bad. When you stack the global benefits and costs up against each other, there is barely a difference between them other than in the marketing spin!
The SolarPV industry will claim Wind generates lots of unrecyclable waste, kills rare birds, is a hazard for shipping and causes infrasound harm to nearby residents.
Neither Wind nor SolarPV comment on the battery industry because they need batteries or they are literally dead and buried being unrecyclable.
The Hydrogen industry will tell you batteries are filthy, short lived and consume rare resources.
Battery manufacturers will tell you hydrogen is made from coal, is highly inefficient and will consume all our drinking water.
The fossil fuel industry presents a conglomeration of all these accusations.
They all sprout lies of sorts to line their own pockets, claiming one or the other has some sort of high ground is political not technical decision!
The truth is many of the accusations have some substance in a certain limited frame of reference, which is usually a privileged perspective that is chosen to make one technology look good and the other look bad. When you stack the global benefits and costs up against each other, there is barely a difference between them other than in the marketing spin!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"