Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The strange case of George Santos
#16
Of course, we can't forget, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."

Apparently Clinton justified his porky on the grounds that penovaginal intercourse did not occur.  When he finally fessed up, it was to an "improper physical relationship".

The difference in the standards expected of US and Australian politicians is interesting.  Santos can get away with concocting a fictional life, family, education and career while Dominic Perrottet is held to account for wearing a Nazi uniform to a fancy dress party when he was 21.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The strange case of George Santos - by Mav - 01-22-2023, 06:19 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by DJC - 01-22-2023, 10:05 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Lods - 01-22-2023, 11:35 PM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by PaulP - 01-23-2023, 12:49 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Mav - 01-23-2023, 12:56 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by LP - 01-23-2023, 12:59 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by DJC - 01-23-2023, 01:16 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Mav - 01-23-2023, 01:32 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Mav - 01-23-2023, 01:59 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by DJC - 01-23-2023, 04:40 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Lods - 01-23-2023, 07:56 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by LP - 01-25-2023, 02:39 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Lods - 01-25-2023, 03:31 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by DJC - 01-25-2023, 10:43 AM
Re: The strange case of George Santos - by Mav - 02-02-2023, 05:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)