As much as I deplore News Ltd I can't really blame the Harkle predicament on News Ltd, it's Harkle's own doing.
I'd love to lambast News Ltd, I probably can on dozens of issues in any moment, but I can't justify doing so just because one crooked story is relayed by a crooked messenger. Maybe it is a turd wrapped in dung, but does that really make better?
News Ltd aren't an exclusive source on this issue, and much of the various Harkle statements and behaviours are outside of News Ltd scope.
For all the rubbish coming from News Ltd, slamming of Clarkson or calling out misogyny, not a shred of highlighting News Ltd shortcomings will justify or excuse Harkle Guilding the Lily to paint a specific picture, and that they have done, cleverly I admit but innocently I doubt very much. Maybe Harkle are the royalty of plausible deniability.
I expect any day now to be labelled racist again because I think Phil Egan being investigated for fraud might cast a pall over the Dawks Racism investigation, and yet the facts remain a person investigating an integrity issue might not have any, yet we are bound to receive demands to believe the report is the truth. It's uncomfortable just like the Harkle events.
When the public accepts one lie over another, simply because of the way one of the lies might be packaged, the globe is heading into a very very sorry state.
I'd love to lambast News Ltd, I probably can on dozens of issues in any moment, but I can't justify doing so just because one crooked story is relayed by a crooked messenger. Maybe it is a turd wrapped in dung, but does that really make better?
News Ltd aren't an exclusive source on this issue, and much of the various Harkle statements and behaviours are outside of News Ltd scope.
For all the rubbish coming from News Ltd, slamming of Clarkson or calling out misogyny, not a shred of highlighting News Ltd shortcomings will justify or excuse Harkle Guilding the Lily to paint a specific picture, and that they have done, cleverly I admit but innocently I doubt very much. Maybe Harkle are the royalty of plausible deniability.
I expect any day now to be labelled racist again because I think Phil Egan being investigated for fraud might cast a pall over the Dawks Racism investigation, and yet the facts remain a person investigating an integrity issue might not have any, yet we are bound to receive demands to believe the report is the truth. It's uncomfortable just like the Harkle events.
When the public accepts one lie over another, simply because of the way one of the lies might be packaged, the globe is heading into a very very sorry state.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"