Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN
#71
There are a few layers of issue at the time but largely any lack of application didn't come because of financial difficulties.  My recollection was that the path to pursue an a league license cost 5 million dollars and required money to apply.

Think about the timeline.  It cost victory 4.5 million for their A league license.  500k contributed by FFA because they couldn't cover the full 5 million for the license.

The nsl was disbanded in 04 and a leagues first season in 05. 



Don't confuse effect with cause is what im getting at.  Were south Melbourne in administration and couldn't apply for a license or did they fall into administration because they were going to get denied a license and how better to manage your exit from the top flight be writing off bad debts? 

The administration and player departure happened when it was already apparent that a south bid wouldn't get up is my recollection of events.

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-13-2018, 03:00 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-18-2022, 12:07 PM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-19-2022, 01:13 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-19-2022, 01:17 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-19-2022, 01:23 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-19-2022, 01:29 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-19-2022, 05:37 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-21-2022, 12:38 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by LP - 12-21-2022, 02:00 AM
Re: FFA shooting itself in the foot AGAIN - by Thryleon - 12-22-2022, 02:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)