12-21-2022, 06:35 AM
(12-21-2022, 12:52 AM)LP link Wrote:I get it [member=61]Baggers[/member] , I also get that she is a professional actress.
None of what I have seen or read explains the apparent contradictions in words versus actions.
As for the charitable stuff that wins over the public, I suspect that is what it is designed to do with little on no attached altruism, if and it is a big if, if there is some altruism it's potentially just a side effect. Win, win!
This is why I was hoping you'd seen the doco. The philanthropic work that Harry and Meghan do is not a platitudinous publicity machine for their egos. They actually work with the people doing the leg work... boots on the ground. Yes, there will be fluff and gloss and pearly white teeth and all the other trappings that go with promoting and attracting funding to a cause - one of the reasons that charities realise that they need high profile patrons. If you like, Harry and Meghan are patrons to their own charity (Archewell) who also get down and dirty in the trenches with their employees, as well as playing the glitz and fluff game to get attention. Their causes are ambitious and relevant. Especially empowering women.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

