(12-19-2022, 07:56 PM)PaulP date Wrote:Right, so because in your eyes she's hypocritical, therefore she deserves :No they are your words [member=64]PaulP[/member] I've never made such an assertion.
a. a punishment,
b. the punishment specified by Clarkson.
In other words, as I said earlier, "b1tch had it coming."
Great work LP.
But I'm not going to swallow the spin that Markle is some sort of universal victim.
There is no morality in actions if they are motivated by cash, they don't deliver a key to heaven!
Clarkson / Markle, they are opposite sides of the same coin, and they are working the same crowd. One works the pity angle, the other casts the first stone, but which is which?
We could rewrite this post, as a template as follows;
No they are your words, I've never made such an assertion.
But I'm not going to swallow the spin that ________ is some sort of universal victim.
There is no morality in actions if they are motivated by cash, they don't deliver a key to heaven!
________ / ________, they are opposite sides of the same coin, and they are working the same crowd. One works the pity angle, the other casts the first stone, but which is which?
Insert whatever names you like in just about any order;
Clarkson / Markle
Depp / Heard
Packer / Carey
Pitt / Jolie
Pitt / Aniston
Pretty much anywhere this sort of public media war is declared, altruism is the victim and profit rules.
Most of the public anger and disgust, might well be emotions erupting at the thought of being gamed!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"