(12-19-2022, 06:24 AM)PaulP date Wrote:Right. She's trying to make a buck by following the fairly standard celebrity route, so when deadsh1ts like Clarkson post violent misogynistic filth, then that's OK, because hey, that's just the price of doing business ? Maybe the b1tch just had it coming ? Surely you can see the narrative you're setting up here ? You do realise the media portrays Lady Di as holier than thou, despite the fact that she cheated on her husband. The narratives between the two women are totally different, and they're intended to be different, and they're structured to be different. I'm not for or against Di or Markle or anyone else.Clarkson is only made relevant by your posts, his abhorrent rhetoric should not be used to excuse Markle's actions, actions that are clearly contrary to her words.
And as for the comparison to Essendon, I mean what ?
They aren't so much victim as they are instigator.
Much of the royalty is living proof of the dangers of inbreeding!
I can't be sure whether Diana's mental state and actions were cause or effect, the waters are too muddy.
Finally, as for the society socials queens standing up to defend Markle with assertions that Clarkson is proof of her media claims, well ..... It's a bit like cyanide claiming arsenic is evil!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

