12-18-2022, 01:19 AM
Socials suggesting Head was dudded by another umpire who fails to understand the technology.
As I understand the argument, Snicko synchronises noise spike with video. But the ball clearly clips Head's shirt, however there is only one Snicko spike which must be the contact of the ball flicking the shirt. If it had hit his gloves there should have been two Snicko spikes in the video frames shown on the replay.
It seems reasonable, there was a clear gap between Head's hand and his body, so it seems there should have been two Snicks given one is clearly the shirt.
As I understand the argument, Snicko synchronises noise spike with video. But the ball clearly clips Head's shirt, however there is only one Snicko spike which must be the contact of the ball flicking the shirt. If it had hit his gloves there should have been two Snicko spikes in the video frames shown on the replay.
It seems reasonable, there was a clear gap between Head's hand and his body, so it seems there should have been two Snicks given one is clearly the shirt.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"