10-24-2022, 08:39 AM
(10-24-2022, 07:09 AM)PaulP link Wrote:Generous to a fault.
Wisecracks aside, no individual player or NA as a governing body made any comments about ending the sponsorship deal. One of the players "reportedly" said she did not want to wear the logo because of her concerns about the company’s record on Indigenous issues. There's nothing in anything that I can't find about individual players or NA setting a future direction about the deal. There's nothing about any dialogue, any attempts to discuss the issues. Once Hancock became aware of the stance taken by the team, they offered a 4 month olive branch and pulled the deal. Yes, 4 months is better than nothing, but it's not really the point IMO.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/others...order.html
This was our former Australian captain's views 3 weeks ago.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

