10-18-2022, 01:29 AM
(10-17-2022, 09:16 PM)LP link Wrote:You do realize this is a false flag entity, the name is a direct contradiction to the interests of those on the panel, they masquerade as a nuclear industry panel when they are in fact an assemblage of nuclear abolitionists claiming to be impartial.
That panels behaviour is the exact thing that has turned me away from green and renewable energy, a lie is a lie no matter which direction it comes from.
They are the nuclear industry version of the Australian Vaccination Network! :o
I think you may be stretching things just a tad there LP
The WNISR is up front about its opposition to nuclear power. However, that doesn't detract from the data presented in its reports, most of which is drawn from sources such as nuclear power generator companies' annual reports, the IAEA, Nuclear Energy International magazine, the Economic Commission for Europe, the US Department of State, White House Fact Sheets, and other national governments' status reports. The WNISR even presents a comparison of its findings with those of the IAEA so you can drill down and satisfy yourself about the reliability of conflicting data sets.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball

