(08-15-2022, 10:25 AM)shawny date Wrote:Firstly yes they did say it reduces your odds of getting it! The narrative was then conveniently changed when the numbers kept increasing despite the bulk of the population being vaccinated. But they still went to the extent of preventing the unvaccinated from majority of workplaces (excluding the law fraternity of course)There was never a change in narrative., that spread and the growing case numbers is exactly what should happen as a virus spreads through the population, the science of epidemiology is the study of such events and I'm sure the epidemiologists know more about it than Facebook, News Ltd or just about everyone else.
Unvaccinated are many many times more likely to end up in ICU, so it's reasonable that they should be restricted, otherwise through the results of their deliberate choice to avoid vaccination they are putting the kibosh on a resources shared with and paid for by everybody, and deliberately spreading the disease to those people who have no choice and cannot be vaccinated, anti-vaxers are k@#ts!.
The problem isn't the health system, politics or the law, the problem is the hypocritical behaviour of the anti-vaccination lobby, refusing the jab then crying like babies for a life saving cure! Like we didn't see that coming, becuase that is what the anti-vaxxers do better than anything else, bitch like cut snakes!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

