Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2022
#18
AFL 2022 Rd 20: Carlton vs Adelaide
It will go down as our most disappointing performance for the year. Granted that they’ve been playing better, but we were weak. Not enough will.

Trends:
[1] There were 10 voters for this round. I didn’t vote, I didn’t see any of the game. I am quite happy about that, everything considered.

[2] The rating, 5.7, is our lowest for the year. That represents an E-.

[3] 8 players got a mention this week, which is one of the lowest of the season.

[4] The average of 19 is our equal lowest for the year.

[5] Patrick Cripps managed his 7th BOG for the season. Sam Walsh was 2nd yet again.

[6] Tom de Koning had an ordinary one. One of the reasons we lost so poorly.

[7] 2 players got votes from every voter; Cripps was one, Cerra was the other. Sam Walsh missed from 1 voter, as did Matthew Kennedy.

[8] 4 players managed 100 votes or better, which is half of the total players getting a vote.

[9] Doc remains the only vote getter for every game, although this was not his best. Probably his least effective.

Votes:
Cripps, Patrick 262
Walsh, Sam 188
Kennedy, Matthew 137
Cerra, Adam 108
McGovern, Mitchell 74
Docherty, Sam 63
Young, Lewis 17
Weitering, Jacob 6

Progressive Voting:
3484 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
3325 - Walsh, Sam (0)
2290 - Docherty, Sam (0)
2156 - Saad, Adam (0)
2011 - Curnow, Charles (0)
1962 - Hewett, George (0)
1720 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
1115 - Cerra, Adam (0)
1001 - McKay, Harrison (0)
835 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
834 - de Koning, Tom (0)
616 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
469 - Young, Lewis (0)
401 - Fisher, Zac (0)
257 - Durdin, Corey (0)
231 - William, Zac (0)
222 - O'Brien, Lochie (0)
216 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
184 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
150 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
105 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
79 - Martin, Jack (0)
76 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
72 - Boyd, Jordan (0)
48 - Newnes, Jack (0)
47 - Carroll, Jack (0)
41 - Motlop, Jesse (0)
29 - Setterfield, Will (0)
29 - Stocker, Liam (0)
11 - Owies, Matthew (0)
4 - Kemp, Brodie (0)

Cripps maintains a small lead. Walsh is catching up vote-wise, even if he isn't playing as well as he could.
Close between 3rd and 6th.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 03-15-2022, 06:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 03-26-2022, 05:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-04-2022, 10:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-11-2022, 12:34 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-18-2022, 01:32 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-24-2022, 03:49 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-05-2022, 10:03 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-12-2022, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-30-2022, 03:11 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-30-2022, 03:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 06-15-2022, 09:45 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-08-2022, 02:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-08-2022, 02:48 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-14-2022, 11:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-20-2022, 11:04 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-24-2022, 10:48 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-04-2022, 07:10 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-12-2022, 10:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-18-2022, 11:17 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-19-2022, 11:04 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 09-05-2022, 06:42 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by dodge - 09-05-2022, 07:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by pinot - 09-05-2022, 08:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by percy - 09-05-2022, 09:13 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 09-05-2022, 10:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)