In my own perspective I can't say any of the bible is valid, but that's my own perspective and I do not impose it on others.
I'm not sure the debating of the how a belief is obtained invalidates the freedom of choice provided that choice doesn't harm others. As I've mentioned, there are no calls from those wishing to abstain for the event to be stopped, just a handful of people stating they would rather not participate.
As far as I can tell the accused people didn't even make their belief public, they are now being shamed for having it having been exposed by some 3rd party, maybe even or perhaps probably a disgruntled punter who's multi-bet has been mangled!
Do we roll out the stocks from now on whenever a personal and private belief offends?
I'm not sure the debating of the how a belief is obtained invalidates the freedom of choice provided that choice doesn't harm others. As I've mentioned, there are no calls from those wishing to abstain for the event to be stopped, just a handful of people stating they would rather not participate.
As far as I can tell the accused people didn't even make their belief public, they are now being shamed for having it having been exposed by some 3rd party, maybe even or perhaps probably a disgruntled punter who's multi-bet has been mangled!
Do we roll out the stocks from now on whenever a personal and private belief offends?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"