General Discussions

[LP]

I’m open to scientific argument but not unscientific what-ifs.

What-ifs are called hypotheticals, and they form the basis of most of the arguments that are made law.

Most of the debate is political and social biased, I can't take it seriously and it's laughable to accept everyone involved in the process is altruistic but only if they come from one side of the debate, in fact it is quite the opposite and it's truly a case of how both sides of this debate can be disingenuous.

It will be interesting to see what happens when a professional female athlete transitions to male, then decides that they still want to compete against the girls after the effects of all those treatments, many treatments which are currently banned as performance enhancing apparently, but maybe only banned if you are not transitioning!