Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2022
#4
Round 3: Carlton vs Hawthorn
After such a great start, we were lucky to win. But we did win.

Trends:
[1] This week there were 13 voters. I guess we welcome in the new norm. However, I do find it disappointing.

[2] The rating this week was 8.77, effectively a B-. Probably a realistic rating of our performance. All of the ratings were between a C and a B.

[3] This week we had 17 players get a mention. This was more like our wins of recent years where everybody did something, but there were few stand out performances. For all that, we are having more standout performances, which is a major positive for us.

[4] This week the average vote was 29, the lowest of the season. Expected, considering how we played.

[5] Congratulations to Sam Docherty for a clear BOG this week. He managed 331 votes and has been in our best every game this year. What a comeback! I wasn’t expecting him to have much impact this year at all! Patrick Cripps and Jack Silvagni each managed 202 votes to come second. Cripps has started the year magnificently.

[6] Other than Cripps, our midfielders were not as significant this week, even with the return of Cerra. Our game plan is very dependent on our midfield, which appears to be an area that we can be attacked. It is also very clear that Sam Walsh is struggling relative to his last few seasons.

[7] 3 players, Cripps, Docherty and Silvagni, managed votes from all voters. Weitering missed one voter. This suggests that not as many of our players were as dominant as they have been.

[8] 5 players again managed to get 100 votes or more for this game. Hewett and Cripps have managed that for all 3 games so far.

[9] Marc Pittonet may not attract a lot of votes each game, but the fact that he has polled in all 3 games is significant. It is something that is very important for our structure.

Votes:
Docherty, Sam 331
Cripps, Patrick 202
Silvagni, Jack 202
Weitering, Jacob 199
Hewett, George 105
Kennedy, Matthew 64
Curnow, Charles 64
McKay, Harrison 40
Young, Lewis 37
Pittonet, Marc 13
Walsh, Sam 13
Cerra, Adam 10
Newman, Nicholas 10
Durdin, Corey 7
O'Brien, Lochie 7
Setterfield, Will 7
William, Zac 3

Progressive Voting:
919 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
567 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
472 - Docherty, Sam (0)
376 - Hewett, George (0)
329 - Curnow, Charles (0)
255 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
225 - Cerra, Adam (0)
216 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
210 - McKay, Harrison (0)
150 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
109 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
100 - Saad, Adam (0)
69 - Walsh, Sam (0)
58 - Durdin, Corey (0)
50 - O'Brien, Lochie (0)
38 - Young, Lewis (0)
36 - William, Zac (0)
17 - Fisher, Zac (0)
11 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
7 - Setterfield, Will (0)
7 - Owies, Matthew (0)
7 - de Koning, Tom (0)
4 - Martin, Jack (0)


Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 03-15-2022, 06:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 03-26-2022, 05:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-04-2022, 10:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-11-2022, 12:34 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-18-2022, 01:32 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 04-24-2022, 03:49 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-05-2022, 10:03 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-12-2022, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-30-2022, 03:11 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 05-30-2022, 03:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 06-15-2022, 09:45 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-08-2022, 02:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-08-2022, 02:48 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-14-2022, 11:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-20-2022, 11:04 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 07-24-2022, 10:48 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-04-2022, 07:10 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-12-2022, 10:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-18-2022, 11:17 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 08-19-2022, 11:04 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 09-05-2022, 06:42 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by dodge - 09-05-2022, 07:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by pinot - 09-05-2022, 08:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by percy - 09-05-2022, 09:13 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2022 - by crashlander - 09-05-2022, 10:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)