CV and mad panic behaviour

[kruddler]

If that's your conclusion so be it.  All from people with no peer reviewed papers on their work, and a secretive lab to which they have no access .. in short, they don't know and you sure as hell don't.  But carry on.

That is my conclusion.

Its also the conclusion of the guy you wanted everyone to read. Not sure why you can't see that.

To bring this back to footy for a second.

What he is saying, is that based on the shots on goal, the distances of the balls kicked around the ground, it can not be determined that there was a breeze blowing to one end of the ground. There may very well have been a breeze, but there is not enough data to say so with certainty.
People there felt a breeze.
People predicted a breeze prior to the game.
If there was a breeze, it would result in data basically the same as that.
Evidence can not prove there was not a breeze.

But....we can not be 100% sure there was a breeze based on the data alone.

What you are reading from that is.....that there was no footy and it was actually a monster truck rally....and it was in a dome.

How and why you get to that conclusion based on the above information is anybodys guess, but thats something only you can answer.