(02-22-2022, 11:33 PM)Mav date Wrote:How can adverse studies be included in the site's "meta-analysis" as positive ones? Amazing ...At this stage all meta analysis is redundant in regards to COVID, we've millions of global physical cases to use and no longer need to extrapolate obscure results from aggregating smaller studies especially smaller meta analysis studies.
In any case, there are serious questions of validity whenever meta analysis aggregates meta analysis, many say that is invalid by default.
Meta analysis is supposed to aggregate smaller physical studies, field trials, in situ, lab in vitro, etc., etc., to simulate a bigger/broader physical trail, not an aggregation of other meta analysis. In effect meta analysis of meta analysis is like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy.
Even worse, many of the meta analysis in the aggregation refer to the same fault physical trials. It's like using footage of one single car accident to explain every car accident that ever happened.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"