CV and mad panic behaviour

[Mav]

Interesting to see how that site treated the Together trial published on 6/8/2021 which was conducted in Brazil and supervised by McMaster University, Canada.

The "data" from the trial which presumably is fed into the site's mashup showed an 18% improvement in mortality and a 9% improvement in extended ER observations. You'd imagine that such results would be celebrated but instead the site devotes screenfuls of takedowns to prove that the study is corrupt and untrue. It's almost as if the trial actually concluded that Ivermectin was useless.

And indeed the trial concluded that ivermectin showed “no effect whatsoever” on the trial’s outcome goals — whether patients required extended observation in the emergency room or hospitalization.

How can adverse studies be included in the site's "meta-analysis" as positive ones? Amazing ...