11-19-2021, 01:52 AM
The interesting thing is that he isn't a Doctor. He has a Ph.D in nurse education, but I'm guessing most assume he's a doctor of medicine when they view his videos. He's apparently working as a nurse, and I'm guessing that they don't call him Dr Campbell when he's working.
That's not to say his stuff is to be discounted just because he isn't a medical doctor. After all, nurses have medical qualifications too and a nurse educator would need to be able to understand relevant recent research and make it easily digestible by a wide range of nurses. They would, of necessity, be more academically-oriented than nurses in general practice (and he has a number of post-grad qualifications). And he does do a good job of explaining matters to those of us who aren't health workers.
However, if the plaintiffs in NSW and Victorian challenges to the vaccine mandate sought to rely upon his expert evidence, he'd be blown out of the water by the respective States' experts.
And I was waiting for him to consider whether Ivermectin transcended the "good idea in theory" and became a viable prophylactic in practice. Maybe he did do this in other videos, but this is the main event. I wonder how we would explain the fact that decent studies have shown Ivermectin doesn't work any better than placebos and whether he'd agree that the only studies that suggest otherwise are tainted by poor methodology or outright fraud.
That's not to say his stuff is to be discounted just because he isn't a medical doctor. After all, nurses have medical qualifications too and a nurse educator would need to be able to understand relevant recent research and make it easily digestible by a wide range of nurses. They would, of necessity, be more academically-oriented than nurses in general practice (and he has a number of post-grad qualifications). And he does do a good job of explaining matters to those of us who aren't health workers.
However, if the plaintiffs in NSW and Victorian challenges to the vaccine mandate sought to rely upon his expert evidence, he'd be blown out of the water by the respective States' experts.
And I was waiting for him to consider whether Ivermectin transcended the "good idea in theory" and became a viable prophylactic in practice. Maybe he did do this in other videos, but this is the main event. I wonder how we would explain the fact that decent studies have shown Ivermectin doesn't work any better than placebos and whether he'd agree that the only studies that suggest otherwise are tainted by poor methodology or outright fraud.