CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

I'm sure this video will be of interest to fans and non fans of Ivermectin....

I like him generally, but he has become a bit east/west since his own health scare, and especially when he buys into the political / corporate stuff. He spent a whole video recently countering with people who have critiqued some of his own work, something in the past he would have just ignored.

When you analyse it you can take this recent stuff either way, that he is claiming that if the new Pfizer works then Ivermectin should work, or that he is claiming we know Ivermectin doesn't work so the new Pfizer drug won't. He implies all this without actually stating it, is he being deliberately ambiguous?

At a deep level you can even find some ghastly mistakes in that recent video, that I have to wonder are they accidental or deliberate.

Maybe like we discussed in another thread on another issue, it's perhaps time for a good nap!