CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqwHxTjXgS4
This bloke posts health reports on a finance report I follow and I rate his opinions, he is a cardiologist by trade
and gives an overview on the vaccines and while I have had Pfizer myself and havent been a fan of AstraZ he gives a decent explanation and opinion on AZ and breaks down the technology into simple terms along with the other vaccines.

Thanks for that video, don't know much about the doctor but it's a nice plain language explanation.

As each week passes they find more and more explanations why the few people that get side-effects from various vaccines get them, and they then work to manage that accordingly.

No matter what new vaccine or treatment they introduce, the more doses they issue the more side-effects they will find, it's just a simply statistical relationship.

This means in someway the safest vaccines are the ones they have already issued lots of doses for, as they are now the known knowns!

Finally, one point in relation to the doctors post. The way that companies and countries calculate efficacy is not standardised, and in some cases the way the data is treated and collected is protected and subject to NDAs as commercial in confidence. So it's very hard to compare the efficacy of one versus the other based on the claimed figures, the best way to cut through to the truth is the effect of the vaccine to treatment on the public. Because so many doses of all have been issued globally, the emergency use is 1000x greater than any typical trial, the real world effects are a much more reliable indicator than any manufacturer's claim.