CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

True. I also noted that paragraph when I read it. But remember he was really only addressing lockdowns and said nothing about vaccine mandates (and NSW imposed its vaccine mandate in the health sector before Victoria). Yet the article is apparently being cited as a criticism of vaccine mandates given that this is the issue du jour.

having worked in the industry, I know very well that articles like this, professional articles, are deliberately fashioned to be ambiguous, they are designed to capture as many people from both sides of the argument as possible and will discard credibility as part of doing that!

Interestingly, the internet has greatly reduced the quality of such commentary, because in the past the content passed through a phalanx of sub-editors and editors who would pick it apart, have it reviewed and revised, fact checked long before it hit the street. Now sometimes it's published isn't even passed over by the legal department and gets tagged as 'opinion' to avoid liability.