CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

When the government removed the ability to litigate if the vaccines proved problematic then you created suspicion and doubt.

Why do people who can have the vaccine but refuse to have it still hold the right to sue for COVID treatment, or sue for harm as a result of failed or imperfect COVID treatment?

I have no problems with the legal stance to protect health care workers(Like your family) and the health care system, that is basically what the law is about, stopping innocent bystanders become collateral damage and stopping spurious claims being weaponised to cripple the system. At the time the laws were introduced there were doctors communicating threats made against them by the anti-vax movement, threats which were designed to scare doctors and health workers away from participation in the vaccination effort.

To me the law just didn't go far enough, if someone can have a vaccine but refuse it then they shouldn't be able to sue the health care workers or system for the harm COVID or a COVID treatment does. Refusing COVID treatment is always an option, but it seems very few do!