10-08-2021, 02:18 PM
(10-08-2021, 07:07 AM)DJC link Wrote:That's the thing isn't it; a choice between getting somewhere close to normal or staying as we are now. I know where I'd rather be.
I wasn't sure whether it would be constitutional but all Victorian members of parliament have to produce evidence of vaccination before they can attend parliament now.
Not true by what was stated at the daily announcement by the Victorian government today. MP’s/parliament politicians have only recently been given a mandate to be vaccinated with the first dose by the 22nd of this month. It might be a requirement to stretch this by a week to the 29th of October. The media had plenty to ask as to why every other essential worker needs the first dose by the 15th of October. “Different settings and we handle the members of parliament in our own way through discussions” was the response. Even the CHO Brett Sutton had nothing to add to the line of questions. You would think there would be a common standard for such an issue. Fact is that there are political members that are not vaccinated and still attending parliament for duties by what the authorities have stated Friday.
This digital world is too much for us insects to understand.

