While I sympathise it is not symmetrical, there is a difference between ideology and real world on both sides of this argument.
The cost of giving the unvaccinated liberty while keeping people as safe as possible is high, and the risk of allowing the unvaccinated the liberty to work in critical environments without excessive cost or administrative overheads is also high.
If I'm a cold, calculating economist, accountant or epidemiologist I potentially calculate that the cost of job losses is the lowest cost, but obviously not for the individual!
There may be solutions in the long term, but nobody is going to have the political will or be prepared to take the higher risk path in the short term. It sucks for some but it's just the way it is!
The cost of giving the unvaccinated liberty while keeping people as safe as possible is high, and the risk of allowing the unvaccinated the liberty to work in critical environments without excessive cost or administrative overheads is also high.
If I'm a cold, calculating economist, accountant or epidemiologist I potentially calculate that the cost of job losses is the lowest cost, but obviously not for the individual!
There may be solutions in the long term, but nobody is going to have the political will or be prepared to take the higher risk path in the short term. It sucks for some but it's just the way it is!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

