09-30-2021, 01:29 AM
Not sure any individual is entitled to physically harm others through deliberate invocation of their personal preferences.
There is a huge difference between someone who legitimately cannot be vaccinated and someone who can but refuses vaccination.
People who legitimately cannot be vaccinated and totally reliant on those that can be vaccinated will be vaccinated.
People who legitimately cannot be vaccinated are also the silent victims of those who can be vaccinated but refuse to be vaccinated.
The anti-vaccination stance is not symmetrical in rights, because it leads to more harm than the pro-vaccination movement.
There is a huge difference between someone who legitimately cannot be vaccinated and someone who can but refuses vaccination.
People who legitimately cannot be vaccinated and totally reliant on those that can be vaccinated will be vaccinated.
People who legitimately cannot be vaccinated are also the silent victims of those who can be vaccinated but refuse to be vaccinated.
The anti-vaccination stance is not symmetrical in rights, because it leads to more harm than the pro-vaccination movement.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

